home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1993-01-11 | 46.3 KB | 1,663 lines |
-
- ORDER LIST
-
- MONDAY, JANUARY 11, 1993
-
-
-
- APPEAL -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
-
- 92-837 LOPEZ, RAFEL V. HALE CTY., TX, ET AL.
-
- The judgment is affirmed.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
-
- 91-1141 PRICE, ROBYN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Republic National Bank
-
- of Miami v. United States, 506 U. S. (1992).
-
- 91-1720 CASTRO-VASQUEZ, JESUS, ET AL V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Republic National Bank
-
- of Miami v. United States, 506 U. S. (1992).
-
- 91-1884 TANGONAN, CESAR, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Republic National Bank
-
- of Miami v. United States, 506 U. S. (1992).
-
- 92-511 STEVEDORING SERVICES, ETC. V. ANCORA TRANSPORT, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Republic National Bank
-
- of Miami v. United States, 506 U. S. (1992).
-
- 92-6031 MORRILL, ALFRED O. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
-
- remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the
-
- Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of
-
- the position asserted by the Solicitor General in his
-
- brief for the United States filed November 25, 1992.
-
- 92-6239 PRICE, RICKY LEE V. NORTH CAROLINA
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
-
- remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for
-
- further consideration in light of Morgan v. Illinois,
-
- 501 U. S. (1992).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
-
- No. . JOHN JONES, SR. V. GAYDULA AND KUTALEK
-
- The motion to direct the Clerk to file a
-
- petition for a writ of certiorari out-of-time is denied.
-
- No. . ELIUS REED V. AMAX COAL COMPANY
-
- The motion for reconsideration of the order
-
- denying motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition
-
- for a writ of certiorari out-of-time is denied.
-
- No. . PROGRESS ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING ENTERPRISE, INC.
- V. BEN MASSONGILL
-
- The motion for reconsideration of the order
-
- denying non-attorney leave to file a petition for a
-
- writ of certiorari on behalf of a corporation and
-
- leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.
-
- A-413. JAMES E. LEWIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- The application for release on bond addressed
-
- to Justice Thomas and referred to the Court is denied.
-
- A-445. JACK B. SOLERWITZ V. E.W. JONES
-
- The application for bail addressed to Justice
-
- Blackmun and referred to the Court is denied.
-
- D-940 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT ALLEN MOORE
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Robert
-
- Allen Moore, of Brownsville, Texas, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas
-
- and this Court by order of October 15, 1990, having
-
- suspended the said Robert Allen Moore from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that a response has
-
- been filed;
-
- It is ordered that the said Robert Allen Moore be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1166 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID L. BRODSKY
-
- It having been reported to the Court that David L.
-
- Brodsky, of Clive, Iowa, has been disbarred from the
-
- practice of law by the Supreme Court of Iowa and this
-
- Court by order of October 13, 1992, having suspended the
-
- said David L. Brodsky from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said David L. Brodsky be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
-
-
- D-1168 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CARL M. MITCHELL
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Carl M.
-
- Mitchell, of Hauppauge, New York, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department
-
- and this Court by order of October 13, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Carl M. Mitchell from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Carl M. Mitchell be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1176 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RANDY WAYNE KEITH
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Randy
-
- Wayne Keith, of Chatsworth, California, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of California and this Court by order of October 19,
-
- 1992, having suspended the said Randy Wayne Keith from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Randy Wayne Keith be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1178 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MORRIS EISEN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Morris
-
- Eisen, of New York, New York, has been disbarred from
-
- the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme
-
- Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this
-
- Court by order of October 19, 1992, having suspended the
-
- said Morris Eisen from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Morris Eisen be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1179 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HAROLD MICHAEL FISHMAN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Harold
-
- Michael Fishman, of Great Neck, New York, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate
-
- Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial
-
- Department, and this Court by order of October 19, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said Harold Michael Fishman from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Harold Michael Fishman
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1180 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAY HOWARD LANDAU
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Jay
-
- Howard Landau, of New York, New York, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department,
-
- and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Jay Howard Landau from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Jay Howard Landau be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1181 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STUART CHARLES LEVITAS
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Stuart
-
- Charles Levitas, of Walnut Creek, California, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate
-
- Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial
-
- Department, and this Court by order of October 19, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said Stuart Charles Levitas from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Stuart Charles Levitas
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1184 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAWSON A. McQUAIG, SR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Dawson A.
-
- McQuaig, Sr., of Jacksonville, Florida, has resigned
-
- from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of
-
- Florida and this Court by order of October 19, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said Dawson A. McQuaig, Sr. from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Dawson A. McQuaig, Sr.
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1185 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THEODORE CARLTON RICHARDSON
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Theodore
-
- Carlton Richardson, of Washington, D.C., has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Florida
-
- and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Theodore Carlton Richardson from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Theodore Carlton
-
- Richardson be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of
-
- attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1186 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL McGRADY
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Michael
-
- McGrady, of Seattle, Washington, has resigned from the
-
- practice of law before the Supreme Court of Oregon and
-
- this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Michael McGrady from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Michael McGrady be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1204 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRANKLIN R. SEARS
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Franklin
-
- R. Sears, of Fort Worth, Texas, has been suspended from
-
- the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas and
-
- this Court by order of November 9, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Franklin R. Sears from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that a response has
-
- been filed;
-
- It is ordered that the said Franklin R. Sears be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1210 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BARBARA L. WOLF
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Barbara
-
- L. Wolf, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has been suspended
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Florida
-
- and this Court by order of November 30, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Barbara L. Wolf from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring her to show cause why she should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that a response has
-
- been filed;
-
- It is ordered that the said Barbara L. Wolf be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1219 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EDWARD WILLIAM BABIC
-
- It is ordered that Edward William Babic, of Newport
-
- Beach, California, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1220 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALAN C. SUGARMAN
-
- It is ordered that Alan C. Sugarman, of Boca Raton,
-
- Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1221 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID BRICE TOY
-
- It is ordered that David Brice Toy, of Los Angeles,
-
- California, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1222 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NANCY ANN BAKER
-
- It is ordered that Nancy Ann Baker, of Auburn,
-
- California, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring her to show cause why she should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1223 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALEXANDER THEOHAROUS
-
- It is ordered that Alexander Theoharous, of West
-
- Balm Beach, Florida, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1224 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL S. LINN
-
- It is ordered that Michael S. Linn, of Hartsdale,
-
- New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- 91-1600 HAZEN PAPER CO., ET AL. V. BIGGINS, WALTER
-
- The motion of respondent to strike supplemental
-
- brief is denied.
-
- 91-7604 ANTOINE, JEFFERY V. BYERS & ANDERSON, INC.
-
- The motion of National Association of Criminal
-
- Defense Lawyers, et al. for leave to file a brief as
-
- amici curiae is granted.
-
- 91-7849 BUCKLEY, STEPHEN V. FITZSIMMONS, MICHAEL, ET AL.
-
- 92-259 OK TAX COMMN. V. SAC & FOX NATION
-
- The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to
-
- participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for
-
- divided argument are granted.
-
- 92-207 UNITED STATES V. PADILLA, XAVIER, ET AL.
-
- The motion of the Solicitor General to dispense
-
- with printing the joint appendix is granted.
-
- 92-351 HELLER, LEONARD, ETC. V. DOE, SAMUEL, ETC., ET AL.
-
- The motion of Voice of the Retarded, et al. for
-
- leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae
-
- and for divided argument is denied.
-
-
-
- 92-357 SHAW, RUTH O., ET AL. V. BARR, ATTY GENERAL, ET AL.
-
- The motion of appellants to dispense with printing
-
- the joint appendix is granted.
-
- 92-621 RAKE, DONALD, ET AL. V. WADE, WILLIAM J.
-
- The motion of Consumer Education and Protective
-
- Association, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici
-
- curiae is granted.
-
- 92-725 GODINEZ, WARDEN V. MORAN, RICHARD A.
-
- The motion for appointment of counsel is granted
-
- and it is ordered that Cal J. Potter, III, Esquire, of
-
- Las Vegas, Nevada, is appointed to serve as counsel for
-
- the respondent in this case.
-
- 92-6082 SINDRAM, MICHAEL J. V. VIRGINIA
-
- The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of
-
- order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is
-
- denied.
-
- 92-6171 JONES, SYLVESTER V. JACKSON, JUDGE, USDC, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is
-
- allowed until February 1, 1993, within which to pay the
-
- docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a
-
- petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this
-
- Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny
-
- the petition for a writ of certiorari.
-
-
-
-
-
- 92-6443 IN RE JOHN T. FOWLER
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until
-
- February 1, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee
-
- required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
-
- compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
-
- 92-6493 DEMOS, JOHN ROBERT V. SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is
-
- allowed until February 1, 1993, within which to pay the
-
- docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a
-
- petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this
-
- Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny
-
- the petition for a writ of certiorari.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
-
- 91-8010 RHOADES, PAUL E. V. IDAHO
-
- 91-8331 MONTALVO, MICHAEL V. STAMM, JEFFREY, ET AL.
-
- 91-8346 SAMMONS, MICHAEL L. V. PHILLIPS, LEROY, ET AL.
-
- 92-372 TATARANOWICZ, MARY, ET AL. V. SULLIVAN, SEC., H&HS
-
- 92-417 AXMEAR, FREDERICK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-427 DANNIS, CHARLES, ET AL. V. RESOLUTION TRUST, ET AL.
-
- 92-428 GRAFF, STANLEY V. V. BANK ONE, TEXAS, ET AL.
-
- 92-449 YU, JUNG YUL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-456 ) BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 92-457 ) SEA AIRMOTIVE, INC., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-467 GILLESPIE, JOHN V. V. MANNES, DIANE H.
-
- 92-516 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS, ETC. V. DAKOTA GASIFICATION, ET AL.
-
- 92-526 ONE PARCEL 456 CAFFERTY RD. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-544 PETRUS, EDWARD, ET AL. V. INSPECTOR GENERAL, H&HS
-
- 92-545 UNITED STATES V. GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO.
-
- 92-552 BAKER, JOE V. GULF & WESTERN INDUS., ET AL
-
- 92-563 HELTON, CLIFFORD, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-569 NATL. KIDNEY PATIENTS, ET AL V. SULLIVAN, SEC., HHS, ET AL.
-
- 92-571 ) PaineWEBBER INCORPORATED V. BankATLANTIC
- )
- 92-765 ) BankATLANTIC V. PaineWEBBER INC.
-
- 92-574 TOBIAS, RICHARD V. UNIV. OF TEXAS, ET AL.
-
- 92-585 YEAGER, WILLIAM N., ET AL. V. CAMP, BILLY J.
-
- 92-590 MEYERLAND CO., ET AL. V. FDIC, ETC.
-
- 92-595 REID, JOE W. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-607 GOODNER, ALBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-633 ROBINSON, KEVIN V. VIRGINIA
-
- 92-634 ALABAMA V. GINGO, McRAY, ET AL.
-
- 92-639 AGUIRRE, BEATRICE, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 92-642 ADKINS, MELVILLE, ET AL. V. SAFEWAY, INC., ET AL.
-
- 92-646 PULIDO, LUIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-652 PAPENDICK, DAVID V. SULLIVAN, SEC. H&HS
-
- 92-658 LATHAM, G. FRANKLIN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-659 EASLEY, STEVEN V. SOUTHERN SHIPBLDG. CORP.
-
- 92-662 CEDAR COAL COMPANY V. SHUFF, JEWELL, ETC., ET AL.
-
- 92-665 DAVIS, DAN O. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-689 McMILLAN, JACQUELINE V. HUNT, ISAAC, ET AL.
-
- 92-697 WANGURI, MARTIN V. PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY
-
- 92-705 DAVIS, EVELYN V. TOWNSEND, ROBBIE, ET AL.
-
- 92-715 ULLOA, RICHARD, ET AL. V. WESTERN SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL
-
- 92-740 C.F. BEAN CORPORATION V. MID-VALLEY, INC.
-
- 92-742 CURTIS, ARTHUR S. V. WOLF-LENKIN LTD.
-
- 92-747 McCOLLOUGH, WM., ET UX. V. A. G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC.
-
- 92-748 AL DRY DOCK & SHIPBUILDING V. HOLCOMBE, WILLIE
-
- 92-749 CAMPOS, JESSE, ET AL. V. HOUSTON, ET AL.
-
- 92-754 ANGEL, THOMAS, ET UX. V. FROEHLICH, JUDGE, SUPER. CT.
-
- 92-756 RUTLAND, ET AL. V. INDUS. BANK OF JAPAN, ET AL.
-
- 92-759 JONES, ARTHUR V. ABC, INC.
-
- 92-761 LANKFORD, GEORGE V. GEORGIA
-
- 92-768 LIVADITIS, ANTHANASIOS, ETC. V. ROSARIO, MARILUZ, ET AL.
-
- 92-769 SOMMER, ERVIN V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CA, ETC.
-
- 92-770 SCHIER, CLARENCE V. GOLDBERG, JERRY, ET AL.
-
- 92-771 HASENFUS, EUGENE, ET AL. V. SECORD, RICHARD, ET AL.
-
- 92-776 ZIMMER, HENRY V. MINNESOTA
-
- 92-778 RUSSELL, GORDON, ET UX. V. BD. OF APPLS., TRURO, ET AL.
-
- 92-782 WESTON, JoANNE M. V. RODRIGUEZ, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- 92-783 DALLAS & MAVIS FORWARDING V. GENERAL DRIVERS, ETC.
-
- 92-786 STONE, DEBORAH, ET AL. V. PRINCE GEORGE'S CTY., ET AL.
-
- 92-788 COOK CTY., IL, ET AL. V. CARSTON, HAROLD, ET AL.
-
- 92-790 SCHOCH, PAULINE V. PENNSYLVANIA
-
- 92-791 ZAHARIA, RONALD, ET AL. V. AURORA MUNICIPAL CT., ET AL.
-
- 92-792 PUCKETT, CARROLL V. ALABAMA STATE BAR
-
- 92-794 MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL. V. GREENWOOD TRUST COMPANY
-
- 92-797 GALLEGOS, RAYMOND, ET UX. V. ESPANOLA
-
- 92-802 O'LEARY, JAMES V. SACRAMENTO, ET AL.
-
- 92-803 SPEACHT, WILLIAM V. MOBIL CHEM. CO.
-
- 92-804 WALLENSTEIN, DIR., KING CTY. V. SCHWENDEMAN, DAVID
-
- 92-806 COSSETT, JAMES, ET UX. V. FEDERAL JUDICIARY, ET AL.
-
- 92-809 FIELDS, RONA V. CLARK UNIV.
-
- 92-810 LEGG, R. DAVID V. UNITED MKT. INTL.
-
- 92-811 DEUTCSH, ARTHUR V. BIRMINGHAM POST CO.
-
- 92-813 McGOWAN, JOHN V. MS STATE OIL & GAS BOARD
-
- 92-814 PEPPER BURNS INSULATION V. ARTCO CONTRACTING, INCORP.
-
- 92-818 LEMELSON, JEROME V. MATTEL, INC.
-
- 92-820 FERNANDEZ, ALBERTO V. SCULLY, WARDEN
-
- 92-821 BAYH, GOV. OF IN, ET AL. V. GOVT. SUPPLIERS, ET AL.
-
- 92-822 McFARLAND, MARICELA, ET AL. V. CHENEY, SEC OF DEFENSE
-
- 92-823 WOODS, LUCILLE V. DUNLOP TIRE CORPORATION
-
- 92-826 SNELLING, LONNIE V. WESTHOFF, THOMAS, ET AL.
-
- 92-829 MOUNTAIN WATER, CO. V. MT DPT. PUBLIC SVC., ET AL.
-
- 92-831 BETHLEHEM STEEL, ET AL. V. GRANT, ROYSWORTH, ET AL.
-
- 92-832 GUZOWSKI, FRANK, ET AL. V. HARTMAN, BERNARD, ET AL.
-
- 92-834 LEVASSEUR, MARK V. MASSACHUSETTS
-
- 92-835 SMITH, RODNEY V. VIRGINIA
-
- 92-836 PELUSO, JOHN V. ALLEN, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- 92-839 FREIGHTCOR SERVICES, INC. V. VITRO PACKAGING, INC.
-
- 92-842 EMORY, EMERSON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-845 KENNEALLY, LEO V. LUNGREN, ATTY GEN CA, ET AL.
-
- 92-846 MARTIN, MARSHALL, ET AL. V. OH TURNPIKE COMMN.
-
- 92-847 HENSS, JOHN V. MARTIN, SEC. OF LABOR
-
- 92-852 BISHOP, SYLVESTER V. SOUTHRAIL CORP., ET AL.
-
- 92-860 AVILA, GUILLERMO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-864 ALEXANDER, EMMA V. RICE, SECRETARY OF AIR FORCE
-
- 92-870 O'BRIEN, WILLIAM J. V. CONRAIL
-
- 92-871 WEICHERT, ROBERT N. V. ROBERTS, ELAINE W.
-
- 92-891 DONESKI, BERNARD, ET UX. V. MD COMPTROLLER OF TREASURY
-
- 92-892 CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY V. SNIDER, SHARON
-
- 92-897 REYNOLDS, FREDERICK V. MARYLAND
-
- 92-911 PIPEFITTERS PENSION, ET AL. V. WALDO, RUSSELL
-
- 92-915 DOFF, JEROME V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-920 ) TANNER, CLAUDE V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 92-6665 ) KOTVAS, JOSEPH H. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-922 POLK, JAMES, ET UX. V. DIXIE INSURANCE COMPANY
-
- 92-946 WILKINS, OSCAR V. BURLINGTON NO. RR COMPANY
-
- 92-5209 VILARCHAO, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5277 CRANE, ALVIN W. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-5476 HUDSON, JIMMY D. V. NORTH CAROLINA
-
- 92-5554 MOSS, BILLY ROY V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-5577 WAGSTAFF-EL, RAYMOND V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5599 THOMAS, TIMOTHY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5663 TAYLOR, ALFRED V. SNIDER, WILLIAM, ET AL.
-
- 92-5715 WEBB, HENRY C. V. ANGSTADT, CHARLES
-
- 92-5747 BURROWS, JOE V. ILLINOIS
-
- 92-5805 HERNANDEZ, JESUS J. V. WOOTEN, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-5848 GREEN, DOUGLAS D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5871 RUIZ, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5885 DELGADO-PERU, NICHOLAS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5887 BETANCOURT, RAIMUDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5894 PONCHO, CLYDE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5898 BRANSON, CARL V. CARMOUCHE, ANGELA, ET AL.
-
- 92-5910 ANTONELLI, MICHAEL C. V. TRUE, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-5965 REDDICK, LAMONT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6010 JOHNSON, ANDREW V. ILLINOIS
-
- 92-6025 DECKARD, KENNETH T. V. OHIO
-
- 92-6058 RILEY, JAMES W. V. SPENCER, A., ET AL.
-
- 92-6077 PROVOST, TERRANCE KENNETH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6089 SMITH, CURTIS D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6092 BROWN, DeWAYNE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6093 BOBADILLA-LOPEZ, MANUEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6105 SANDS, RICKY L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6115 REILLY, MARK A. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-6120 LANGE, VIRGINIA. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6137 LABOY, RAUL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6145 ) GRAY, MARCUS V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 92-6170 ) CALDWELL, TIMOTHY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6178 BROWN, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6204 JAMERSON, LARRY D. V. USDC ED CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-6209 MARTINEZ, BENJAMIN DAVID V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6220 CHAN, THOMAS V. INS
-
- 92-6244 ANDERSON, GLENN F. V. DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE
-
- 92-6253 GREEN, BUCK V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL
-
- 92-6282 EVANS, MARTIN V. OHIO
-
- 92-6289 JONES, SYLVESTER V. JUD. BRANCH OF U.S., ET AL.
-
- 92-6290 CAPOSEY, THOMAS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6305 BARNARD, HAROLD A. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-6326 PHILLIPS, GEORGE T. V. BRENNAN, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6332 BARON, KEITH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6336 BROWN, LEONIDAS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6339 COOK, EDWARD DEAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6346 PRIEST, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6357 UTLEY, JAMES KENNETH V. INDIANA
-
- 92-6358 COLEMAN, ISAAC J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6360 BLUE, ROBERT Z. V. ILLINOIS
-
- 92-6362 WALLACE, JAMES GRANVIL V. ARIZONA
-
- 92-6383 FELAN, ELIZABETH A. V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL
-
- 92-6385 SMITH, SCOTT V. BLODGETT, JAMES
-
- 92-6387 WIGLEY, TROY EUGENE V. ALFRED HUGHES UNIT, ET AL.
-
- 92-6388 WHITEHEAD, DAVID V. GATES, DIR., CIA
-
- 92-6389 THORNTON, DOUGLAS V. QUINLAN, DIR.
-
- 92-6390 VICK, ELBERT V. MAYNARD, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6397 JONES, QUEEN E. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 92-6398 JACKSON, A. C. V. SANDAHL, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6403 HERRON, BILL V. WOODRUFF, MacARTHUR, ET AL.
-
- 92-6405 ESTREMERA, JOEL V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- 92-6406 JONES, RICKY L. V. THOMPSON, WARDEN
-
- 92-6407 FORD, ISAAC V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-6411 CARTA, ISABELLE V. TOWN OF FAIRFIELD, ET AL.
-
- 92-6412 CALLIS, STANLEY JOSEPH V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC
-
- 92-6420 MITAN, JASON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6421 PADIOS, ROBERT V. CONTINENTAL GROUP, ET AL.
-
- 92-6424 WATSON, KEITH V. TAYLOR, WARDEN
-
- 92-6434 ROE, DANIEL E. V. INDIANA
-
- 92-6437 MESSAMORE, JAMES FRANKLIN V. FALK, DIR. OF CORR., HAWAII
-
- 92-6441 CASAS-ACEVEDO, MARTIN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6444 FINOCCHI, JOSEPH G. V. ARIZONA DOC, ET AL.
-
- 92-6445 JOHNSON, GARRISON V. BORG, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6447 JOHNSTON, HIRAM R. V. CHESNEY, SUPT., ET AL.
-
- 92-6458 SANDERS, HENRY V. SOUTHERN MANAGEMENT, ET AL.
-
- 92-6460 VALDIVIEZ, JOSE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6462 SAVENELLI, JOSEPH V. MEACHUM, COMMR., CT DOC
-
- 92-6465 CHRISTENSEN, RUDOLPH V. ARMONTROUT, BILL, ET AL.
-
- 92-6467 REYES, PABLO V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-6475 MALANEZ, VERNON A. V. LYNN, SEC., LA DEPT., ET AL.
-
- 92-6476 BATES, NELSON PATTERSON V. ALABAMA
-
- 92-6477 COOPER, WILLIAM V. GROOSE, SUPT.,JEFFERSON CITY
-
- 92-6478 AYRES, CARL V. DELO, SUPT.,POTOSI CORR. CTR
-
- 92-6481 HARRISON, MICHAEL D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6482 DEMPSEY, BOYCE V. WTLK TV 14, ET AL.
-
- 92-6483 WOLFE, BURTON V. INTL. BHD. TEAMSTERS
-
- 92-6485 AMARIGLIO, JACK V. CENTURA BANK, ET AL.
-
- 92-6488 CASTRO, ELIGIO V. NYC BOARD OF EDUCATION,ET AL
-
- 92-6489 MORGAN, VICTOR V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6492 MacGUIRE, WILLIAM A. V. HENRY, WILLIAM O.E., ET AL.
-
- 92-6494 CARNEY, JAMES V. DEPT. OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
-
- 92-6495 AMMONS, VINCENT L. V. ALTERGOTT, KATHY
-
- 92-6497 TURNER, TERRY MICHAEL V. SUMNER,
-
- 92-6502 HENDERSON, LELAND W. V. DUCKWORTH, SUPT.
-
- 92-6503 LEWIS, DAVID ALLEN V. COURT OF APPEALS, 12TH DIST.
-
- 92-6504 RYAN, CRAIG M. V. SARGENT, WILLIS, WARDEN
-
- 92-6505 MARTIN, MORRIS V. JONES, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6507 REECE, JOHNN WAYNE V. LOVE, SUPT., HUNTINGDON, ET
-
- 92-6508 WHITE, MICHAEL V. MORRIS, TERRY, ET AL.
-
- 92-6513 ALLEN, CALVIN V. MADIGAN, EDWARD, ET AL.
-
- 92-6514 JENSEN, HERBERT O. V. RAYL, RICHARD, ET AL.
-
- 92-6516 FIGUEROA, RAFAEL O. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6519 WINT, MICHAEL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6523 SCHUTTERLE, LOYEL V. IA COUNTY BOARD, ET AL.
-
- 92-6524 CAMARENA, HECTOR V. SUPERIOR COURT OF LONG BEACH
-
- 92-6525 THOMPSON, LAWRENCE EDWARD V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-6528 SCEIFERS, DONALD R. V. VAIL, KENDALL
-
- 92-6531 JONES, DOROTHY M. V. NATL. SUPER MARKETS, ET AL.
-
- 92-6533 MacFARLANE, ROBERT GEORGE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6537 McCARTHY, JOHN MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6538 LUCIEN, RUDOLPH L. V. ILLINOIS
-
- 92-6539 MOOREHEAD, BENJAMIN V. FLORIDA
-
- 92-6540 PAYNE, JOSEPH PATRICK V. THOMPSON, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6541 MURRAY, ROGER, ET AL. V. TENNESSEE
-
- 92-6542 RODRIGUEZ, JERARDO V. BLODGETT, SUPT., WA , ET AL.
-
- 92-6543 CHANEY, ALBERT V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-6545 ARNETTE, SAM T. V. DEPT. OF H&HS
-
- 92-6547 DEROCK, ROY T. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- 92-6548 KETCHUM, DAVID T. V. GRIFFITH, BRAD, ET AL.
-
- 92-6549 GLASS, JAMES F. V. DUCKWORTH, SUPT.
-
- 92-6550 ANGARITA-GARZON, LUIS H. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6552 ORTIZ, RUBEN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6555 ALEXANDER, RICKY DEAN V. TX DCJ, ET AL.
-
- 92-6556 VU, DALE V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL
-
- 92-6557 ESTES, NEWTON C. V. McCOTTER, O. L., ET AL.
-
- 92-6560 MENDOZA, ROGACIANO GONZALES V. BLODGETT, SUPT., WA, ET AL.
-
- 92-6561 THOMAS, RALPH INTERNATIONAL V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-6562 CHINN, DAVEL V. V. OHIO
-
- 92-6563 CLAIR, KENNETH V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-6565 EDWARDS, JAMES R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6566 JONES, JUANITA M. V. PENNSYLVANIA
-
- 92-6567 JONES, BRENDA E., ET AL. V. LASSEN, SVEIN J., ET AL.
-
- 92-6568 JONES, ARTHUR L. V. THOMAS, SUPT.
-
- 92-6569 USHER, NATHANIEL V. VASQUEZ, WARDEN
-
- 92-6571 SAMM, EVANGELINE V. PLAZA WEST
-
- 92-6575 ROJAS, MARTIN V. OHIO
-
- 92-6576 MASON, MICHAEL, ET UX. V. USDC FOR CD CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-6577 MORRIS, JAMES V. FBI, ET AL.
-
- 92-6579 GEE, DONALD V. BALL, JAMES W., ET AL.
-
- 92-6580 STEVENSON, MARION HOWARD V. ADA COUNTY SHERIFF
-
- 92-6581 KROUPA, MARY V. COBB COUNTY, GA, ET AL.
-
- 92-6582 ANGELO, JAMES W. V. CITY & CO. OF SAN FRANCISCO
-
- 92-6585 BUNKER, HARVEY CLARENCE V. BORG, WARDEN
-
- 92-6586 CHURCH, JIMMY LEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6588 HENLEY, BRUCE C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6589 MOLANO-GARZA, ARNOLDO V. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMN.
-
- 92-6590 WHITEHEAD, TYREES C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6599 GILMAN, RICHARD M. V. ESTELLE, WARDEN
-
- 92-6600 GALFORD, KEVIN V. MASSACHUSETTS
-
- 92-6601 BROOKS, JESSE JAMES V. BAILEY, JACK
-
- 92-6602 SIMS, TERRY MELVIN V. FLORIDA
-
- 92-6606 LUEVANOS, AMADOR GARCIA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6607 MEGGERS, KEVIN D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6608 LANE, RONNY JOE V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-6610 ATANASOFF, LUBO V. DOVICIO, GREG, ET AL.
-
- 92-6613 VALENZUELA, LORDES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6614 BRAGER, EMMITT V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-6615 HURWITZ, THEODORE W. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6616 LAYNE, PATRICIA AGATHA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6618 FRENCH, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6621 JONES, JOHNNIE LEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6625 BISHOP, TERRY V. ANGELONE, RON, ET AL.
-
- 92-6626 DEEMER, ROBERT V. CAIN, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6627 CHAVEZ, NICOLAS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6628 CORNILLOT, HECTOR V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6631 VALENCIA-MAZARIEGOS, RAUL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6632 RUSSELL, ROBERT PETER V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6633 SOLIS-CANTU, MARIA LUISA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6634 SULLIVAN, MARY ANN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6635 DUNCAN, MICHAEL ALLAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6637 DOE, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6638 DRAWDY, JEFFREY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6640 URIBE-SANTAMARIA, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6642 QUICHOCHO, RICHARD V. GUAM
-
- 92-6643 MORRIS, ROHAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6644 LAWRENCE, DENNIS CHARLES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6645 SMITH, THOMAS J. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 92-6646 KETCHUM, ROBERT H. V. BURGESS, IBSEN
-
- 92-6649 HANSEN, ERLING K. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- 92-6650 GERMANY, FRANKIE L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6651 HALL, MILTON E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6652 JEFFERSON, JEFFREY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6655 CAMPBELL, ORTON T. V. SALVIONE, VINCENT P.
-
- 92-6657 BRIGGS, SUSAN CAROL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6658 BEEDE, JAMES DARYL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6660 THOMAS, TOMMY L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6661 SOLOMON, RICHARD J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6666 GAVIN, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6667 HOCHSCHILD, THOMAS R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6670 RUIZ, JOSE LUIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6673 PRADO, FERNANDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6674 PARRA, JOSE VALENCIA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6676 WATKINS, RONALD V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC
-
- 92-6678 STEPOLI, JOHN ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6683 KAADI, ISSAM K. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6684 KNIGHT, THOMAS L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6685 JONES, RONALD L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6686 JOHNSTON, DARRIN D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6689 KRESE, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6690 HULL, ROSCOE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6692 BREWER, DAVID F. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6693 YOUNG, LOVINA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6697 FORTENBERRY, CHARLES E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6700 LARCK, TERRY ARNOLD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6701 MOATES, ARTHUR V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6705 CRANE, MAJOR V. KENTUCKY
-
- 92-6706 SCHULTZ, BRIAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6711 BARELA, JERRY ARTHUR V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6719 HOFFMAN, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6722 EGAN, ROBERT D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6724 GROSS, BILLY F. V. LOCKHART, DIR., AR DOC
-
- 92-6726 HAWKINS, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6729 WILLEY, FREDERICK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6737 COLLINS, VERNON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6738 CHARLES, TONEY ALEXANDER V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6742 HEIZER, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6744 HAYS, RICKY A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6746 WIDBY, JOSEPH B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6747 GINES, MARION G. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6754 NEWT, CURTIS DALE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6755 RUDOLPH, LARRY LeROY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6756 POGANY, SCOTT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6760 NORMAN, GEORGE Q. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6777 BIVINS, RONALD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6778 CORTES, CLAUDIO JESUS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6780 BEHRENS, HAROLD ONEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6787 NESBITT, FRANK A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6792 JONES, SYLVESTER V. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMN.
-
- 92-6799 HARDING, CURTIS F. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6800 FARYMAN, LARRY D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6806 PRAY, WAYNE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6807 CLIPPER, RONALD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6821 CURRIE, DAVID JACKSON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6822 BLALOCK, PRESTON EUGENE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6823 SPARKS, CRAWFORD THOMAS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6825 STIER, ARTHUR HARRIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6827 SAUNDERS, MILES DAVIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6830 FORBES, GLENDON, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6833 GEORGE, RUSSELL M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6835 HICKMAN, BETTY A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6836 FORD, JAMES R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6839 MORENO, GERMAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- 92-373 ROCHE, TIM V. FLORIDA
-
- The motion of petitioner to enlarge the record is
-
- denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-579 BLODGETT, JAMES, ET AL. V. MENDOZA, ROGACIANO G.
-
- The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-606 BURLINGTON N. RR CO.L V. BHD. OF MAINTENANCE, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Association of American Railroads, et
-
- al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is
-
- granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is
-
- denied.
-
- 92-610 SHERMAN, ROY V. LUDINGTON, WILLIAM, ET AL.
-
- 92-6157 FRAZIER, MALCOLM V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- Justice White would grant certiorari.
-
- 92-784 OK COALITION, ET AL. V. FELDMAN, NANCY, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Oklahoma for leave to intervene is
-
- granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is
-
- denied.
-
- 92-817 SOLDIER OF FORTUNE, ET AL. V. BRAUN, MICHAEL, ET AL.
-
- The motion of National Association for Information
-
- Services for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is
-
- granted. The motion of National Rifle Association of
-
- America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is
-
- granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is
-
- denied.
-
-
-
-
-
- 92-948 PHELPS, COY V. CARLSON, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or
-
- decision of this petition.
-
- 92-5850 MAHARAJ, KRISHNA V. FLORIDA
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari limited to
-
- Question 3 presented by the petition.
-
- 92-5862 FAULKENBERRY, DARYL J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice White and Justice O'Connor would grant
-
- certiorari.
-
-
-
- HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
-
-
- 92-6866 IN RE BILLY LLOYD PUNCHARD
-
- 92-6908 IN RE BERNARD DICKERSON
-
- The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are
-
- denied.
-
-
- MANDAMUS DENIED
-
-
- 92-867 IN RE EARLENE POLYAK
-
- 92-6318 IN RE ROBERT PETER RUSSELL
-
- The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
-
- 92-6442 IN RE PARIS VALENTINE
-
- The petition for writ of mandamus and/or
-
- prohibition is denied.
-
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
-
- 91-2044 LEE, DENNIS M. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 91-8369 BANKS, ALFRED V. SAN DIEGO CTY., ET AL.
-
- 91-8640 WALKER, TRACY L. V. SEC. OF THE TREASURY, IRS
-
- 91-8725 BELL, JAMES H. V. BAKER, WARDEN
-
- 92-5028 BENNETT, JACK V. GEORGIA
-
- 92-5049 THOMPSON, ALVIN F. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5099 THOMAS, JUSTIN E. V. TENNEY ENGINEERING, INC.
-
- 92-5124 SCHURR, IVAN V. CHASE HOME MORTGAGE
-
- 92-5168 JONES, DONALD L. V. DEPT. OF AIR FORCE, ET AL.
-
- 92-5216 MERIT, SAM V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5236 MASON, SEAN W. V. LOS ANGELES CTY. SUPER. CT.
-
- 92-5295 FLORES, JUAN H. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5487 WABEKE, PAUL V. MAATMAN, HOWARD, ET AL.
-
- 92-5517 LOMBARDO, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5519 LEWIS, ROSALINE B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5728 BENNETT, DANIEL M. V. VIRGINIA
-
- 92-5765 SPEARMAN, JOSE L. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-5802 KOLOCOTRONIS, CYRIL A. V. HOLCOMB, SUPT.
-
- 92-5817 MASON, MICHAEL W. V. MUNICIPAL CORP. OF CA
-
- 92-5933 WIGLEY, TROY E. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-5934 WIGLEY, TROY E. V. HUGHES UNIT, TX DCJ, ET AL.
-
- 92-5972 SPEARMAN, JOSE L. V. GARNER, WARDEN
-
- 92-5978 IN RE DOROTHY LITZENBERG
-
- 92-5994 CRAWFORD, JAMES H. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6019 FARLEY, JAMES E. V. LOVE, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-6103 IN RE JOSEPH WASKO
-
- 92-6181 TEMPLEMAN, CHUCK V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
- 91-1935 KOSTELLO, NICHOLAS, ET AL. V. WASHINGTON
-
- The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed
-
- further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The
-
- petition for rehearing is denied.
-
-
-
- ASSIGNMENT ORDER
-
- An order of the Chief Justice designating and
-
- assigning Justice Powell (Retired) to perform judicial
-
- duties in the United States Court of Appeals for the
-
- Fourth Circuit from November 30, 1992 through June 11,
-
- 1993, and for such time as may be required to complete
-
- unfinished business, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 294(a),
-
- is ordered entered on the minutes of this Court pursuant
-
- to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 295.
-
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the following
-
- lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-